|
A delegation of U.S. religious leaders called for Washington
to negotiate with Tehran, following the delegation's landmark
two-and-a-half-hour meeting with Iranian President Mahmoud
Ahmadinejad.
The 13-person religious delegation was the first to meet
with an Iranian president since the Islamic Revolution in
1979.
''It was a very cordial meeting,'' said Reverend Shanta Premawardhana
of the National Council of Churches, an ecumenical coalition
that includes more than 100,000 local congregations and 45
million people in the United States.
''It was late in the evening. It started at 8:00 PM and lasted
until about 10:30,'' he told OneWorld. ''[Ahmadinejad] seemed
a little tired. He had been traveling a lot, but we were grateful
that he gave us a full two and a half hours.''
Premawardhana said the Iranian president told the group of
United Methodist, Episcopal, Baptist, Catholic, Evangelical,
Quaker, and Mennonite leaders that Iran has no intention to
acquire or use nuclear weapons. Ahmadinejad also said the
Israeli-Palestinian conflict can only be solved through political
not military means.
Upon their return to the United States, the religious leaders
called for direct face-to-face talks between the U.S. and
Iranian governments and more people-to-people exchanges, including
among religious leaders and members of the Iranian Parliament
and U.S. Congress.
''The Iranian government has already built a bridge toward
the American people by inviting our delegation to come to
Iran,'' the religious leaders said in a statement. ''We ask
the U.S. government to welcome a similar delegation of Iranian
religious leaders to the United States.''
Joe Volk of the Quaker Friends Committee on National Legislation
told OneWorld he found Ahmadinejad to be ''compelling'' in
the argument that Iran's nuclear program was being developed
for energy production rather than weaponry.
''He said 'Look at it practically,''' Volk quoted the Iranian
president. '''Nuclear weapons didn't save the apartheid regime
in South Africa, didn't save the Soviet Union, and why would
it save us? Secondly, if we had nuclear weapons we'd be in
a deterrence situation. It's not something we could use and
if we did use them there'd be overwhelming force in the other
direction. We really are not crazy. '''
On Sunday, while the religious delegation was on a plane
back to the United States, Ahmadinejad gave a speech about
his country's nuclear program.
"Enemies have no concern about enrichment in Iran,''
Ahmadinejad said, according to his country's state news agency.
''They are worried that they might yield to determination
of the Islamic Revolution and lose their dignity through Iran's
access to nuclear technology."
He added, "By the grace of God, enemies will be obliged
to succumb to the Iranian nation's will. Enemies have pinned
hope on certain individuals inside the country who chant for
disdain and surrender.''
Reflecting on the speech, Joe Volk of the Quaker Friends
Committee on National Legislation said, ''If you listen to
the public rhetoric of the government of Iran and if you listen
to the public rhetoric of the government of the United States
you would say the gap between these two governments is so
great that it simply cannot be overcome. But when you look
at the national interests that the U.S. has stated and the
national interests that Iran has stated, they're much closer
together than the rhetoric would indicate. The differences
are relatively small.''
Volk cited a proposal the Iranian government allegedly made
to Washington through a Swiss ambassador in 2003. The proposal,
according to former U.S. Congressional aid Trita Parsi, contained
promises to disarm the Lebanese political and paramilitary
organization Hezbollah and end support to other groups the
Bush administration has put on its terrorist watch list including
Hamas and Islamic Jihad. The Iranian proposal also supposedly
agreed to recognize a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian
conflict and promote peace in Iraq.
The Bush administration did not respond to the proposal.
(OneWorld)
|